Ouch. That’s Hot.

February 28th, 2009

My Media Is Junkie

Posted by gw in Said

A friend of mine recently announced that he was giving up the Internet for Lent, with the exception of necessary e-mail and a brief window on Sundays to actually read the electronic content that must be read.  I found this odd.  I start every day by looking over a dozen blogs, a few news sites, and a little app called Facebook.  Everyday, including Sundays.  Why?  Because I’m afraid I’ll miss something.  I want to be in-the-know, so I subscribe to a dozen magazines, spend an hour a day “keeping up on things” via the magic web and scratch my old-school itches with a daily walk to grab the morning paper still stuck in the frozen slush at the end of the driveway.

Now, you’d think this would lead to a mind filled with interesting facts and informed opinions on the greater good for the greatest number of mankind.  However, the cracked cranium of Grant Wentzel is really just an un-indexed pit of half-remembered half-truths battling about for a moment in the mental sun.  And like a board meeting with a bunch of budding bigshots, it’s the loudest, brashest, and most bombastic butthole that gets the floor and carries the vote.

A love of learning and a catholic disposition is a lovely thing, but I’ve really got to re-evaluate my motivation for such unfiltered consumption.  This informational gluttony is more about the Fear of being left out and a futile quest for Power and Control over the great unknown.  My mind is left crapulous, constipated.  There’s Anxiety in it, and I need to let it go.

February 26th, 2009

Think Fast! Be Happy! Shazam!

Posted by gw in Found

Interesting article tying rapid thought with happiness, mental stagnation with depression, and repetitive just-can’t-Let-IT-GO! thought patterns to anxiety.  Much of this would be simple common sense, but the interesting thing here is the Cart/Horse (aka Chicken/Egg) conundrum.  That is, does our mood affect our thoughts or do our thoughts affect our mood?

The advice: if you’re down, do a crossword and get the noggin noodling with something new.

I know that when I’ve got A.N.Ts. running up and down my brain (that’s Automatic Negative Thoughts, ‘natch) the best thing for me to do is drop to my knees and ask God for something else to think about.  Most recently the answer was:  “Just think about Jerry playing guitar.”  So I did, and now I’ve got the opening riff of “Lovelight” wedged in my head.  I think this is a blessing.  It sure as hell works!

(… without a warning…. you broke my heart…)

Article via BoingBoing

February 10th, 2009

My Revolutionary Road, or Paris On The Prairie

Posted by gw in Read

So my sweet, straight-talking wife says that I’m an arrogant bastard.  She pointed out that every time I write up a little review of some old book or another I tend to knock it.   I really think I’m a fair-and-balanced kind of guy, but one negative comment has a way of erasing all of the rest.  As it is with the rest of life, you’ve got to be sure to sandwich the cold cuts with some fresh baked lovin’ from the oven.

Anyhow, she’s wrong (I’m totally awesome.)  Sometimes I do find something that I like the whole way through.  Top-to-bottom.  Stem-to-stern.  Or this case: wingtips-to-fedora.  Revolutionary Road is such a book.  And why do I like it so much?  Because it’s all about me!  See, I’m not really an arrogant bastard, I’m a selfish bastard.  Of this I quibble not.

But before the love-fest cranks into overdrive let me get something out of the way…

They went and made a movie of the damned thing.  Staring Leo, who looks like my old pal JR.  (Jonathan Robert Mitchell, where are you?)  And I was a little underwhelmed.  It was slow.  It plodded along, somehow failing to properly establish characters and motivations while leaving plenty of space for plaintive looks out of picture windows and numbingly redundant trips on commuter trains.  I thought they’d do the opposite — steam up the affairs, hype the small threats of violence, blow something up, add a homoerotic tryst, maybe some aliens.  But it just sort of hung there on the screen, pleasantly enough but somehow disappointing, much like the suburban lives of the Wheelers. (Ah-ha!)

(Cuing up Ac-Cent-Tchu-Ate The Postive, returning to the book, delving into the text…)

I’m a suburban guy.  I say this much as one would say:  “I am a white guy”, or “I was born in Pittsburgh”, or “My mole-infested skin makes me a likely candidate for melanoma.”  It’s just the way I am.  Now, I’ve done my best to branch out and claim a spicier slice of life, but with kids and crap comes a tractor beam of responsibility that yanks you out to that balanced little patch of always-cut grass where you have space and safety within driving distance of shopping and shows, which offers a very comfortable life and a nearly bankable shot at a sensible return on your mid-sized mortgage .  It’s the Bang-For-The-Buck thing to do!  The smart money sez: “Sold!”  So I bought.

I’ve climbed out from the cradle to mount the saddle of suburbia, just like Frank sliding into the shadow of papa Earl Wheeler.  I’m back on a street that looks a lot like the street I grew up on in Stow (backyard adjoining that of Neel Kashkari.)  But there is one big difference:  South Dakota is my Paris.  My wife took the job out here.  I was lured with the promise of time, of space, of a chance to find the Thing I wanted to do.

Now, it’s not as clear-cut as that:  I have too many obligations, responsibilities, and opportunities to lounge about dreaming.  Plus there’s the fact that money must be made by me as well as she.  (The PhD is not a big-dollar guarantee, but academia is lovely place to land.)  But I do have a chance to breathe a little and leave the Paxil behind.

Of course, Paris didn’t work for the Wheelers.  There was a problem with Frank, and I fear it’s the same with me.  The trouble is that Frank didn’t have another game to play, just the promise that he’d be good at something sometime down the road. So eventually life handed him a game.  It’s called marketing, and it really wasn’t so bad.  But instead of finding peace in the present while exploring possible futures he just got grumbly.  I am guilty of the same, but things are looking up.

My apologies for the navel-gazing, but there are too many tangles tethering Frank Wheeler to Grant Wentzel.  But do stop by and join me in a toast:  To life, to the possibilities, to Paris.  Now that I’ve arrived, my book will have a different ending.

February 3rd, 2009

Traveling Mercies / Begging The Question

Posted by gw in Read

And the question is:  How great a sinner must one be, to write a compelling autobiography?

So a book like this has three things going on:  Pearls, Swine, and Slop.  It’s a pigsty of a thing, all mashed together bits of memoir and remembrance, deep-thoughts on the mundane, rounded out by random essays on random events tied together by the merest thread of a conceit:  This happened to me and it’s kinda spiritual.

That was too harsh.  My apologies.  I enjoyed traveling with you, Ms. Lamott.  Mercies, please.  So, let me break it down a little more.

Pearls:  Anne Lamott has some very winning observations here.  Some great descriptions. Shares some hard-earned lessons about forgiveness and overcoming and keeping on.   Some seriously good stuff, especially as she walks the tightrope between pissing off the Conservatives with her big “L” lefty take on all things social and political, and pissing off the Liberals with her insistence on conforming to a pretty old-school orthodox take on Christianity.  (I probably just pissed off all of you by invoking unfair stereotypes of all of you, but time is of the essence. Mercies.)

Swine (aka “The Naughty Bits” or “The Fun Parts”) : There’s a lot of good little vignettes of adolescent kicks and starting-to-rot 60s experimentation that eventually dries up and devolves into crusty old lonely alcoholism.   (To be explored, literarilly, in a moment…)

Slop:  This is the only place where I’ve really got a real beef with the book.  It’s pretty cut-n-pasty and could have used an editor a little less enraptured with Anne’s direct line to the sublime.  (But who am I to argue?  Would my private moments be any more meaningful to anyone else?  Doubtful.)

Back to the original question:  How great a sinner must you be to write a compelling autobiography?

Seems they come in three types:  There’s the memoirs about your troubles.  Then there’s the self-gloat about your accomplishments.  And finally the best of both worlds: Troubles overcome, while you achieved anyway.

I suppose that Anne hits number three with her balance of brain cells lost vs. books published.  But is it enough?  I just don’t know.  For instance, have I sinned enough to ensure a convincing expose? I’ve made my share of mistakes while attempting to grease the bumps in the road while driving alone during a dark night of the soul, been through therapy to work it out, got better, etc.  But am I unique?  Or at this point do we all have enough pictures of dumbness on facebook to make the point moot?  Maybe the point is that exceptionally bad behavior isn’t all that exceptional.  Maybe that should be the boring part of the book instead of the hook.  Maybe we should all take a little longer to blog about the Traveling Mercies than the trash we’ve all got to dig our way through.  Maybe Anne is right.

(And, just maybe, I should give up my insistence on using “There’s” as a contraction of “There Are.”  But that just how I was raised.  Along with Nucular.  Now that’s some fertile soil to mine for the memoirs!  Let’s get typing!)